The
facts of heraldry in North America are quite complex and interesting
due to the multi-cultural history of the continent. A treatment of
this subject is useful to the student and essential to the initiate
on the path to journeyman and master. In general, the art, pageantry,
and historical significance of heraldry is a mystery. When people do
not have the facts, they typically fill in the gaps with readily
available information from popular sources that is often either
incomplete or inaccurate.
In
North America, with the Canadian provinces to the North, the Mexican
states to the South, and what would come to be called the United
States of America in the middle, the complex amalgamation of British,
French, Spanish, and in some instances Dutch and Portuguese
jurisprudence worked to form and influence the corpus of heraldic
expression. It is because of this influence, even though the United
States of America does not regulate private heraldry, that various
Americans can indeed, depending upon their ancestry, and in some
cases place of birth and residence, petition for grants of coats of
arms from Britain, Spain, and other countries. This is not to say
that such grants or registrations originating in a foreign Court are
preferred to a simple assumption of unregulated arms in America. One
should, however, be aware that there is a range of heraldic
expression and custom alive and well in America as diverse as America herself.
A
common question regarding heraldry in the United States of America
is why any American person or institution would want a coat of arms.
Some people think that this is contrary to the American notions of
equality and inconsistent with American history. These unfortunate
misconceptions are common. While the Colonies won independence from
the British Crown on the battlefield and formed a Republic, that
young Republic did not abandon her history. The territory of the
country founded on July 4th, 1776, already had a history of European
settlement spanning two hundred years. The government changed, but
the heritage remained.
While
the new American Constitution declared that Congress would not grant
titles of nobility, there was and is no prohibition on Americans
having or using such titles. They are just inherently foreign in
origin. Similarly, armorial bearings (coats of arms) were not
prohibited. George Washington himself had a coat of arms which is
seen today as the flag of the District of Columbia. Vestiges from the
European feudal system persisted in the Republic. Some State
Governors are still formally addressed as "Excellency" to
this day, a title also once common to the American President. In
fact, John Adams proposed the style of "Highness" for the
President, though this was voted down. From the very beginning of the
Republic, it is clear that the notion of enlightened equality did not
proclude differences. People in America were free to achieve and
attain what they wanted, and that included armorial bearings.
Heraldry
flourished in the American Colonies, with some using their ancestral
arms and some obtaining new grants. Another popular misconception is
that the Colonies were inherently non-noble. In truth, some Colonies
were set up explicitly according to the feudal system, complete with
their own local titled nobility. The notion that all titles of
nobility refer exclusively to territories outside of America is
patently false. While the feudal system ended with the formation of
the Republic, some of the customs, such as heraldry, persisted. Far
from defeating the purpose of “leveling the playing field”
in the new Republic, heraldry was considered quite acceptable in the
young United States. George Washington expressly indicated his
approval that all citizens may have, if they wish, some form of
device or coat of arms to represent themselves. Unlike Great Britain,
this was to be unregulated in the new American Republic. Heraldry
also was and is widely used to represent universities, colleges,
businesses and corporations, organizations, and, of course, the
government itself. The only place in America where heraldry is
regulated is in the government. The United States Army perhaps makes
the most extensive use of heraldry of any branch of the government.
Over
the years, some private organizations have come about in an attempt
to regulate heraldry, albeit in an unofficial way. These are
essentially private clubs that make up their own rules, often
obsessed with the British ways of heraldry. These clubs have also
spawned and fostered the many pseudo-experts that exist in the field
of heraldry. These private individuals derive enjoyment from
critiquing others, often publicly and rudely. Ironically, this comes
from the freedom given to heraldry in America and, even more
ironically, seeks to undo that very freedom. This arrogance is surely
far from the notions of the Founding Fathers.
In
America, armorial bearings serve a two-fold purpose just as they do
in other countries around the world. First, they serve as
identification for a person, a family, or an organization. Second,
they honor heritage or, in the case of an organization, its legacy.
Heraldry, no matter the national origin, represents a link to
one’s past and a tie to one’s origins. Also, in some cases
some Americans assume arms or obtain grants from other countries
(often at a very, very high price) for reasons of ego. This is no
different than the reason some in other countries obtain grants of
arms from their respective heraldic authorities. That the beauty of
heraldry is used by some persons for egotistical reasons is most
unfortunate and contributes to misconceptions in the public mind.
Nevertheless, it is a perfectly honorable practice for Americans to
obtain foreign arms and one that certainly should be encouraged.
Most
in America are not entitled to inherited armorial bearings, but
this, too, is no different than in other countries around the world.
It is safe to say that most legitimate armorial bearings in America
are “new,” that is to say they did not originate in a
foreign country. Family arms are only rightly born by certain members
of the family, and then only when that is the heraldic custom of the
country of origin of the arms, such as in Italy or Germany. In many
locations, most notably in Britain and the British Commonwealth,
armorial bearings are of one individual. Members of the family who
are entitled to use the arms must “difference” them in an
approved manner, i.e., make certain specific changes to indicate that
they refer to a different individual. Unfortunately there is a common
misconception, however, that “family arms” refer to a
specific name, and that anyone with that name may legitimately use
those arms. There are plenty of shops that sell the notorious
“coat of arms of the distinguished Jones family” and the
like. This is all well and good for artistic display, but the chances
of it being one’s actual coat of arms are fairly slim. Despite
these unfortunate misunderstandings and abuses, the freedom of
heraldry established by George Washington and the other Founding
Fathers has allowed new heraldic traditions to be born in America,
creating a legacy that can be passed down through the generations.
An
excellent source book of information that is recommended for study
is: Zieber, Eugene (1984)., Heraldry in America: A Classic Survey of
Coats of Arms and Insignia., Greenwich House. Generally available
from Amazon for around USD $20.00 |